From dfe9a837987aacaffbce020fbf54d8e0afa4bde1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "David S. Miller" Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 23:31:56 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] llc: Kill outdated and incorrect comment. This comment suggested storing two pieces of state in the LLC skb control block, and in fact we do. Someone did the implementation but never killed this todo comment :-) Signed-off-by: David S. Miller --- net/llc/llc_conn.c | 4 ---- 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/llc/llc_conn.c b/net/llc/llc_conn.c index 3477624a4906..c6bab39b018e 100644 --- a/net/llc/llc_conn.c +++ b/net/llc/llc_conn.c @@ -79,10 +79,6 @@ int llc_conn_state_process(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb) if (unlikely(!ev->ind_prim && !ev->cfm_prim)) { /* indicate or confirm not required */ - /* XXX this is not very pretty, perhaps we should store - * XXX indicate/confirm-needed state in the llc_conn_state_ev - * XXX control block of the SKB instead? -DaveM - */ if (!skb->next) goto out_kfree_skb; goto out_skb_put;