luck/tmp_suning_uos_patched
1
0
Fork 1
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

[PATCH] Docs update: small fixes to stable_kernel_rules.txt

Browse Source 
Small spelling, formating & similar fixes to stable_kernel_rules.txt

Signed-off-by: Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
This commit is contained in:
Jesper Juhl 2006-01-09 20:53:59 -08:00 committed by Linus Torvalds
parent 5dd94ed249
commit e48e99093c
1 changed files with 29 additions and 31 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

60
Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txt
View File

@ -1,58 +1,56 @@
Everything you ever wanted to know about Linux 2.6 -stable releases.
Rules on what kind of patches are accepted, and what ones are not, into
the "-stable" tree:
Rules on what kind of patches are accepted, and which ones are not, into the
"-stable" tree:
- It must be obviously correct and tested.
- It can not bigger than 100 lines, with context.
- It can not be bigger than 100 lines, with context.
- It must fix only one thing.
- It must fix a real bug that bothers people (not a, "This could be a
problem..." type thing.)
problem..." type thing).
- It must fix a problem that causes a build error (but not for things
marked CONFIG_BROKEN), an oops, a hang, data corruption, a real
security issue, or some "oh, that's not good" issue. In short,
something critical.
- No "theoretical race condition" issues, unless an explanation of how
the race can be exploited.
security issue, or some "oh, that's not good" issue. In short, something
critical.
- No "theoretical race condition" issues, unless an explanation of how the
race can be exploited is also provided.
- It can not contain any "trivial" fixes in it (spelling changes,
whitespace cleanups, etc.)
whitespace cleanups, etc).
- It must be accepted by the relevant subsystem maintainer.
- It must follow Documentation/SubmittingPatches rules.
- It must follow the Documentation/SubmittingPatches rules.
Procedure for submitting patches to the -stable tree:
- Send the patch, after verifying that it follows the above rules, to
stable@kernel.org.
- The sender will receive an ack when the patch has been accepted into
the queue, or a nak if the patch is rejected. This response might
take a few days, according to the developer's schedules.
- If accepted, the patch will be added to the -stable queue, for review
by other developers.
- The sender will receive an ACK when the patch has been accepted into the
queue, or a NAK if the patch is rejected. This response might take a few
days, according to the developer's schedules.
- If accepted, the patch will be added to the -stable queue, for review by
other developers.
- Security patches should not be sent to this alias, but instead to the
documented security@kernel.org.
documented security@kernel.org address.
Review cycle:
- When the -stable maintainers decide for a review cycle, the patches
will be sent to the review committee, and the maintainer of the
affected area of the patch (unless the submitter is the maintainer of
the area) and CC: to the linux-kernel mailing list.
- The review committee has 48 hours in which to ack or nak the patch.
- When the -stable maintainers decide for a review cycle, the patches will be
sent to the review committee, and the maintainer of the affected area of
the patch (unless the submitter is the maintainer of the area) and CC: to
the linux-kernel mailing list.
- The review committee has 48 hours in which to ACK or NAK the patch.
- If the patch is rejected by a member of the committee, or linux-kernel
members object to the patch, bringing up issues that the maintainers
and members did not realize, the patch will be dropped from the
queue.
- At the end of the review cycle, the acked patches will be added to
the latest -stable release, and a new -stable release will happen.
- Security patches will be accepted into the -stable tree directly from
the security kernel team, and not go through the normal review cycle.
members object to the patch, bringing up issues that the maintainers and
members did not realize, the patch will be dropped from the queue.
- At the end of the review cycle, the ACKed patches will be added to the
latest -stable release, and a new -stable release will happen.
- Security patches will be accepted into the -stable tree directly from the
security kernel team, and not go through the normal review cycle.
Contact the kernel security team for more details on this procedure.
Review committe:
- This will be made up of a number of kernel developers who have
volunteered for this task, and a few that haven't.
- This is made up of a number of kernel developers who have volunteered for
this task, and a few that haven't.