luck/tmp_suning_uos_patched
1
0
Fork 1
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

capabilities: remove task_ns_* functions

Browse Source 
task_ in the front of a function, in the security subsystem anyway, means
to me at least, that we are operating with that task as the subject of the
security decision.  In this case what it means is that we are using current as
the subject but we use the task to get the right namespace.  Who in the world
would ever realize that's what task_ns_capability means just by the name?  This
patch eliminates the task_ns functions entirely and uses the has_ns_capability
function instead.  This means we explicitly open code the ns in question in
the caller.  I think it makes the caller a LOT more clear what is going on.

Signed-off-by: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Serge E. Hallyn <serge.hallyn@canonical.com>
This commit is contained in:
Eric Paris 2012-01-03 12:25:15 -05:00
parent d2a7009f0b
commit f1c84dae0e
5 changed files with 7 additions and 20 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

1
include/linux/capability.h
View File

@ -547,7 +547,6 @@ extern bool has_ns_capability_noaudit(struct task_struct *t,
struct user_namespace *ns, int cap);
extern bool capable(int cap);
extern bool ns_capable(struct user_namespace *ns, int cap);
extern bool task_ns_capable(struct task_struct *t, int cap);
extern bool nsown_capable(int cap);
/* audit system wants to get cap info from files as well */

6
include/linux/cred.h
View File

@ -358,10 +358,12 @@ static inline void put_cred(const struct cred *_cred)
#define current_security() (current_cred_xxx(security))
#ifdef CONFIG_USER_NS
#define current_user_ns() (current_cred_xxx(user_ns))
#define current_user_ns() (current_cred_xxx(user_ns))
#define task_user_ns(task) (task_cred_xxx((task), user_ns))
#else
extern struct user_namespace init_user_ns;
#define current_user_ns() (&init_user_ns)
#define current_user_ns() (&init_user_ns)
#define task_user_ns(task) (&init_user_ns)
#endif

14
kernel/capability.c
View File

@ -408,20 +408,6 @@ bool capable(int cap)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(capable);
/**
* task_ns_capable - Determine whether current task has a superior
* capability targeted at a specific task's user namespace.
* @t: The task whose user namespace is targeted.
* @cap: The capability in question.
*
* Return true if it does, false otherwise.
*/
bool task_ns_capable(struct task_struct *t, int cap)
{
return ns_capable(task_cred_xxx(t, user)->user_ns, cap);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(task_ns_capable);
/**
* nsown_capable - Check superior capability to one's own user_ns
* @cap: The capability in question

4
kernel/ptrace.c
View File

@ -196,7 +196,7 @@ int __ptrace_may_access(struct task_struct *task, unsigned int mode)
smp_rmb();
if (task->mm)
dumpable = get_dumpable(task->mm);
if (!dumpable && !task_ns_capable(task, CAP_SYS_PTRACE))
if (!dumpable && !ns_capable(task_user_ns(task), CAP_SYS_PTRACE))
return -EPERM;
return security_ptrace_access_check(task, mode);
@ -266,7 +266,7 @@ static int ptrace_attach(struct task_struct *task, long request,
task->ptrace = PT_PTRACED;
if (seize)
task->ptrace |= PT_SEIZED;
if (task_ns_capable(task, CAP_SYS_PTRACE))
if (ns_capable(task_user_ns(task), CAP_SYS_PTRACE))
task->ptrace |= PT_PTRACE_CAP;
__ptrace_link(task, current);

2
kernel/sched.c
View File

@ -5409,7 +5409,7 @@ long sched_setaffinity(pid_t pid, const struct cpumask *in_mask)
goto out_free_cpus_allowed;
}
retval = -EPERM;
if (!check_same_owner(p) && !task_ns_capable(p, CAP_SYS_NICE))
if (!check_same_owner(p) && !ns_capable(task_user_ns(p), CAP_SYS_NICE))
goto out_unlock;
retval = security_task_setscheduler(p);