ACPI: EC: Workaround for optimized controllers
Some controllers fail to send confirmation GPE after address write.
Detect this and don't expect such confirmation in future.
This is a generalization of previous workaround
(66c5f4e736
), which did only read address.
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9327
Signed-off-by: Alexey Starikovskiy <astarikovskiy@suse.de>
Tested-by: Romano Giannetti <romano.giannetti@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
2ffbb8377c
commit
f2d68935ba
@ -75,7 +75,8 @@ enum {
|
||||
EC_FLAGS_WAIT_GPE = 0, /* Don't check status until GPE arrives */
|
||||
EC_FLAGS_QUERY_PENDING, /* Query is pending */
|
||||
EC_FLAGS_GPE_MODE, /* Expect GPE to be sent for status change */
|
||||
EC_FLAGS_ONLY_IBF_GPE, /* Expect GPE only for IBF = 0 event */
|
||||
EC_FLAGS_NO_ADDRESS_GPE, /* Expect GPE only for non-address event */
|
||||
EC_FLAGS_ADDRESS, /* Address is being written */
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
static int acpi_ec_remove(struct acpi_device *device, int type);
|
||||
@ -166,38 +167,45 @@ static inline int acpi_ec_check_status(struct acpi_ec *ec, enum ec_event event)
|
||||
|
||||
static int acpi_ec_wait(struct acpi_ec *ec, enum ec_event event, int force_poll)
|
||||
{
|
||||
int ret = 0;
|
||||
if (unlikely(test_bit(EC_FLAGS_ADDRESS, &ec->flags) &&
|
||||
test_bit(EC_FLAGS_NO_ADDRESS_GPE, &ec->flags)))
|
||||
force_poll = 1;
|
||||
if (likely(test_bit(EC_FLAGS_GPE_MODE, &ec->flags)) &&
|
||||
likely(!force_poll)) {
|
||||
if (wait_event_timeout(ec->wait, acpi_ec_check_status(ec, event),
|
||||
msecs_to_jiffies(ACPI_EC_DELAY)))
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
goto end;
|
||||
clear_bit(EC_FLAGS_WAIT_GPE, &ec->flags);
|
||||
if (acpi_ec_check_status(ec, event)) {
|
||||
if (event == ACPI_EC_EVENT_OBF_1) {
|
||||
/* miss OBF = 1 GPE, don't expect it anymore */
|
||||
printk(KERN_INFO PREFIX "missing OBF_1 confirmation,"
|
||||
"switching to degraded mode.\n");
|
||||
set_bit(EC_FLAGS_ONLY_IBF_GPE, &ec->flags);
|
||||
if (test_bit(EC_FLAGS_ADDRESS, &ec->flags)) {
|
||||
/* miss address GPE, don't expect it anymore */
|
||||
printk(KERN_INFO PREFIX "missing address confirmation,"
|
||||
"don't expect it any longer.\n");
|
||||
set_bit(EC_FLAGS_NO_ADDRESS_GPE, &ec->flags);
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
/* missing GPEs, switch back to poll mode */
|
||||
printk(KERN_INFO PREFIX "missing IBF_1 confirmations,"
|
||||
printk(KERN_INFO PREFIX "missing confirmations,"
|
||||
"switch off interrupt mode.\n");
|
||||
clear_bit(EC_FLAGS_GPE_MODE, &ec->flags);
|
||||
}
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
goto end;
|
||||
}
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
unsigned long delay = jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(ACPI_EC_DELAY);
|
||||
clear_bit(EC_FLAGS_WAIT_GPE, &ec->flags);
|
||||
while (time_before(jiffies, delay)) {
|
||||
if (acpi_ec_check_status(ec, event))
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
goto end;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
printk(KERN_ERR PREFIX "acpi_ec_wait timeout,"
|
||||
" status = %d, expect_event = %d\n",
|
||||
acpi_ec_read_status(ec), event);
|
||||
return -ETIME;
|
||||
ret = -ETIME;
|
||||
end:
|
||||
clear_bit(EC_FLAGS_ADDRESS, &ec->flags);
|
||||
return ret;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static int acpi_ec_transaction_unlocked(struct acpi_ec *ec, u8 command,
|
||||
@ -216,6 +224,9 @@ static int acpi_ec_transaction_unlocked(struct acpi_ec *ec, u8 command,
|
||||
"write_cmd timeout, command = %d\n", command);
|
||||
goto end;
|
||||
}
|
||||
/* mark the address byte written to EC */
|
||||
if (rdata_len + wdata_len > 1)
|
||||
set_bit(EC_FLAGS_ADDRESS, &ec->flags);
|
||||
set_bit(EC_FLAGS_WAIT_GPE, &ec->flags);
|
||||
acpi_ec_write_data(ec, *(wdata++));
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -231,8 +242,6 @@ static int acpi_ec_transaction_unlocked(struct acpi_ec *ec, u8 command,
|
||||
clear_bit(EC_FLAGS_QUERY_PENDING, &ec->flags);
|
||||
|
||||
for (; rdata_len > 0; --rdata_len) {
|
||||
if (test_bit(EC_FLAGS_ONLY_IBF_GPE, &ec->flags))
|
||||
force_poll = 1;
|
||||
result = acpi_ec_wait(ec, ACPI_EC_EVENT_OBF_1, force_poll);
|
||||
if (result) {
|
||||
printk(KERN_ERR PREFIX "read timeout, command = %d\n",
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user