AUDIT: Avoid scheduling in idle thread
When we flush a pending syscall audit record due to audit_free(), we might be doing that in the context of the idle thread. So use GFP_ATOMIC Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
582edda586
commit
f55619642e
@ -41,6 +41,7 @@
|
||||
#include <linux/time.h>
|
||||
#include <linux/kthread.h>
|
||||
#include <linux/netlink.h>
|
||||
#include <linux/compiler.h>
|
||||
#include <asm/unistd.h>
|
||||
|
||||
/* 0 = no checking
|
||||
@ -778,13 +779,13 @@ static void audit_log_task_info(struct audit_buffer *ab)
|
||||
up_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static void audit_log_exit(struct audit_context *context)
|
||||
static void audit_log_exit(struct audit_context *context, unsigned int gfp_mask)
|
||||
{
|
||||
int i;
|
||||
struct audit_buffer *ab;
|
||||
struct audit_aux_data *aux;
|
||||
|
||||
ab = audit_log_start(context, GFP_KERNEL, AUDIT_SYSCALL);
|
||||
ab = audit_log_start(context, gfp_mask, AUDIT_SYSCALL);
|
||||
if (!ab)
|
||||
return; /* audit_panic has been called */
|
||||
audit_log_format(ab, "arch=%x syscall=%d",
|
||||
@ -900,9 +901,11 @@ void audit_free(struct task_struct *tsk)
|
||||
return;
|
||||
|
||||
/* Check for system calls that do not go through the exit
|
||||
* function (e.g., exit_group), then free context block. */
|
||||
* function (e.g., exit_group), then free context block.
|
||||
* We use GFP_ATOMIC here because we might be doing this
|
||||
* in the context of the idle thread */
|
||||
if (context->in_syscall && context->auditable)
|
||||
audit_log_exit(context);
|
||||
audit_log_exit(context, GFP_ATOMIC);
|
||||
|
||||
audit_free_context(context);
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -1007,7 +1010,7 @@ void audit_syscall_exit(struct task_struct *tsk, int valid, long return_code)
|
||||
return;
|
||||
|
||||
if (context->in_syscall && context->auditable)
|
||||
audit_log_exit(context);
|
||||
audit_log_exit(context, GFP_KERNEL);
|
||||
|
||||
context->in_syscall = 0;
|
||||
context->auditable = 0;
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user