uprobes: Kill uprobe_consumer->filter()
uprobe_consumer->filter() is pointless in its current form, kill it. We will add it back, but with the different signature/semantics. Perhaps we will even re-introduce the callsite in handler_chain(), but not to just skip uc->handler(). Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Acked-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
f0744af7d0
commit
fe20d71f25
@ -37,11 +37,6 @@ struct inode;
|
||||
|
||||
struct uprobe_consumer {
|
||||
int (*handler)(struct uprobe_consumer *self, struct pt_regs *regs);
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* filter is optional; If a filter exists, handler is run
|
||||
* if and only if filter returns true.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
bool (*filter)(struct uprobe_consumer *self, struct task_struct *task);
|
||||
|
||||
struct uprobe_consumer *next;
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
@ -477,10 +477,8 @@ static void handler_chain(struct uprobe *uprobe, struct pt_regs *regs)
|
||||
return;
|
||||
|
||||
down_read(&uprobe->consumer_rwsem);
|
||||
for (uc = uprobe->consumers; uc; uc = uc->next) {
|
||||
if (!uc->filter || uc->filter(uc, current))
|
||||
for (uc = uprobe->consumers; uc; uc = uc->next)
|
||||
uc->handler(uc, regs);
|
||||
}
|
||||
up_read(&uprobe->consumer_rwsem);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -550,7 +550,6 @@ static int probe_event_enable(struct trace_uprobe *tu, int flag)
|
||||
return -EINTR;
|
||||
|
||||
utc->cons.handler = uprobe_dispatcher;
|
||||
utc->cons.filter = NULL;
|
||||
ret = uprobe_register(tu->inode, tu->offset, &utc->cons);
|
||||
if (ret) {
|
||||
kfree(utc);
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user