The rbd code has a need to be able to restart an osd request that
has already been started and completed once before. This currently
wouldn't work right because the osd client code assumes an osd
request will be started exactly once Certain fields in a request
are never cleared and this leads to trouble if you try to reuse it.
Specifically, the r_sent, r_got_reply, and r_completed fields are
never cleared. The r_sent field records the osd incarnation at the
time the request was sent to that osd. If that's non-zero, the
message won't get re-mapped to a target osd properly, and won't be
put on the unsafe requests list the first time it's sent as it
should. The r_got_reply field is used in handle_reply() to ensure
the reply to a request is processed only once. And the r_completed
field is used for lingering requests to avoid calling the callback
function every time the osd client re-sends the request on behalf of
its initiator.
Each osd request passes through ceph_osdc_start_request() when
responsibility for the request is handed over to the osd client for
completion. We can safely zero these three fields there each time a
request gets started.
One last related change--clear the r_linger flag when a request
is no longer registered as a linger request.
This resolves:
http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/5026
Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
Reviewed-by: Josh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
Create a slab cache to manage allocation of ceph_osdc_request
structures.
This resolves:
http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/3926
Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
Reviewed-by: Josh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
Create a slab cache to manage ceph_msg_data structure allocation.
This is part of:
http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/3926
Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
Reviewed-by: Josh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
Create a slab cache to manage ceph_msg structure allocation.
This is part of:
http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/3926
Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
Reviewed-by: Josh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
This creates a new source file "net/ceph/snapshot.c" to contain
utility routines related to ceph snapshot contexts. The main
motivation was to define ceph_create_snap_context() as a common way
to create these structures, but I've moved the definitions of
ceph_get_snap_context() and ceph_put_snap_context() there too.
(The benefit of inlining those is very small, and I'd rather
keep this collection of functions together.)
Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
Reviewed-by: Josh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
A WATCH op includes an object version. The version that's supplied
is incorrectly byte-swapped osd_req_op_watch_init() where it's first
assigned (it's been this way since that code was first added).
The result is that the version sent to the osd is wrong, because
that value gets byte-swapped again in osd_req_encode_op(). This
is the source of a sparse warning related to improper byte order in
the assignment.
The approach of using the version to avoid a race is deprecated
(see http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/3871), and the watch parameter
is no longer even examined by the osd. So fix the assignment in
osd_req_op_watch_init() so it no longer does the byte swap.
This resolves:
http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/3847
Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
Reviewed-by: Josh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
Add the ability to provide an array of pages as outbound request
data for object class method calls.
Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
Reviewed-by: Josh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
This patch makes four small changes in the ceph messenger.
While getting copyup functionality working I found two bugs in the
messenger. Existing paths through the code did not trigger these
problems, but they're fixed here:
- In ceph_msg_data_pagelist_cursor_init(), the cursor's
last_piece field was being checked against the length
supplied. This was OK until this commit: ccba6d98 libceph:
implement multiple data items in a message That commit changed
the cursor init routines to allow lengths to be supplied that
exceeded the size of the current data item. Because of this,
we have to use the assigned cursor resid field rather than the
provided length in determining whether the cursor points to
the last piece of a data item.
- In ceph_msg_data_add_pages(), a BUG_ON() was erroneously
catching attempts to add page data to a message if the message
already had data assigned to it. That was OK until that same
commit, at which point it was fine for messages to have
multiple data items. It slipped through because that BUG_ON()
call was present twice in that function. (You can never be too
careful.)
In addition two other minor things are changed:
- In ceph_msg_data_cursor_init(), the local variable "data" was
getting assigned twice.
- In ceph_msg_data_advance(), it was assumed that the
type-specific advance routine would set new_piece to true
after it advanced past the last piece. That may have been
fine, but since we check for that case we might as well set it
explicitly in ceph_msg_data_advance().
This resolves:
http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/4762
Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
Reviewed-by: Josh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
Allow osd request ops that aren't otherwise structured (not class,
extent, or watch ops) to specify "raw" data to be used to hold
incoming data for the op. Make use of this capability for the osd
STAT op.
Prefix the name of the private function osd_req_op_init() with "_",
and expose a new function by that (earlier) name whose purpose is to
initialize osd ops with (only) implied data.
For now we'll just support the use of a page array for an osd op
with incoming raw data.
Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
Reviewed-by: Josh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
There are a bunch of functions defined to encapsulate getting the
address of a data field for a particular op in an osd request.
They're all defined the same way, so create a macro to take the
place of all of them.
Two of these are used outside the osd client code, so preserve them
(but convert them to use the new macro internally). Stop exporting
the ones that aren't used elsewhere.
Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
Reviewed-by: Josh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
In the incremental move toward supporting distinct data items in an
osd request some of the functions had "write_request" parameters to
indicate, basically, whether the data belonged to in_data or the
out_data. Now that we maintain the data fields in the op structure
there is no need to indicate the direction, so get rid of the
"write_request" parameters.
Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
Reviewed-by: Josh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
An osd request currently has two callbacks. They inform the
initiator of the request when we've received confirmation for the
target osd that a request was received, and when the osd indicates
all changes described by the request are durable.
The only time the second callback is used is in the ceph file system
for a synchronous write. There's a race that makes some handling of
this case unsafe. This patch addresses this problem. The error
handling for this callback is also kind of gross, and this patch
changes that as well.
In ceph_sync_write(), if a safe callback is requested we want to add
the request on the ceph inode's unsafe items list. Because items on
this list must have their tid set (by ceph_osd_start_request()), the
request added *after* the call to that function returns. The
problem with this is that there's a race between starting the
request and adding it to the unsafe items list; the request may
already be complete before ceph_sync_write() even begins to put it
on the list.
To address this, we change the way the "safe" callback is used.
Rather than just calling it when the request is "safe", we use it to
notify the initiator the bounds (start and end) of the period during
which the request is *unsafe*. So the initiator gets notified just
before the request gets sent to the osd (when it is "unsafe"), and
again when it's known the results are durable (it's no longer
unsafe). The first call will get made in __send_request(), just
before the request message gets sent to the messenger for the first
time. That function is only called by __send_queued(), which is
always called with the osd client's request mutex held.
We then have this callback function insert the request on the ceph
inode's unsafe list when we're told the request is unsafe. This
will avoid the race because this call will be made under protection
of the osd client's request mutex. It also nicely groups the setup
and cleanup of the state associated with managing unsafe requests.
The name of the "safe" callback field is changed to "unsafe" to
better reflect its new purpose. It has a Boolean "unsafe" parameter
to indicate whether the request is becoming unsafe or is now safe.
Because the "msg" parameter wasn't used, we drop that.
This resolves the original problem reportedin:
http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/4706
Reported-by: Yan, Zheng <zheng.z.yan@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
Reviewed-by: Yan, Zheng <zheng.z.yan@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Sage Weil <sage@inktank.com>
Right now the data for a method call is specified via a pointer and
length, and it's copied--along with the class and method name--into
a pagelist data item to be sent to the osd. Instead, encode the
data in a data item separate from the class and method names.
This will allow large amounts of data to be supplied to methods
without copying. Only rbd uses the class functionality right now,
and when it really needs this it will probably need to use a page
array rather than a page list. But this simple implementation
demonstrates the functionality on the osd client, and that's enough
for now.
This resolves:
http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/4104
Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
Reviewed-by: Josh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
Change the names of the functions that put data on a pagelist to
reflect that we're adding to whatever's already there rather than
just setting it to the one thing. Currently only one data item is
ever added to a message, but that's about to change.
This resolves:
http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/2770
Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
Reviewed-by: Josh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
This patch adds support to the messenger for more than one data item
in its data list.
A message data cursor has two more fields to support this:
- a count of the number of bytes left to be consumed across
all data items in the list, "total_resid"
- a pointer to the head of the list (for validation only)
The cursor initialization routine has been split into two parts: the
outer one, which initializes the cursor for traversing the entire
list of data items; and the inner one, which initializes the cursor
to start processing a single data item.
When a message cursor is first initialized, the outer initialization
routine sets total_resid to the length provided. The data pointer
is initialized to the first data item on the list. From there, the
inner initialization routine finishes by setting up to process the
data item the cursor points to.
Advancing the cursor consumes bytes in total_resid. If the resid
field reaches zero, it means the current data item is fully
consumed. If total_resid indicates there is more data, the cursor
is advanced to point to the next data item, and then the inner
initialization routine prepares for using that. (A check is made at
this point to make sure we don't wrap around the front of the list.)
The type-specific init routines are modified so they can be given a
length that's larger than what the data item can support. The resid
field is initialized to the smaller of the provided length and the
length of the entire data item.
When total_resid reaches zero, we're done.
This resolves:
http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/3761
Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
Reviewed-by: Josh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
In place of the message data pointer, use a list head which links
through message data items. For now we only support a single entry
on that list.
Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
Reviewed-by: Josh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
Rather than having a ceph message data item point to the cursor it's
associated with, have the cursor point to a data item. This will
allow a message cursor to be used for more than one data item.
Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
Reviewed-by: Josh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
A message will only be processing a single data item at a time, so
there's no need for each data item to have its own cursor.
Move the cursor embedded in the message data structure into the
message itself. To minimize the impact, keep the data->cursor
field, but make it be a pointer to the cursor in the message.
Move the definition of ceph_msg_data above ceph_msg_data_cursor so
the cursor can point to the data without a forward definition rather
than vice-versa.
This and the upcoming patches are part of:
http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/3761
Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
Reviewed-by: Josh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
The bio is the only data item type that doesn't record its full
length. Fix that.
Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
Reviewed-by: Josh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
We know the length of our message buffers. If we get a message
that's too long, just dump it and ignore it. If skip was set
then con->in_msg won't be valid, so be careful not to dereference
a null pointer in the process.
This resolves:
http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/4664
Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
Reviewed-by: Josh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
This patch:
15a0d7b libceph: record message data length
did not enclose some bio-specific code inside CONFIG_BLOCK as
it should have. Fix that.
Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
Reviewed-by: Josh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
Finally! Convert the osd op data pointers into real structures, and
make the switch over to using them instead of having all ops share
the in and/or out data structures in the osd request.
Set up a new function to traverse the set of ops and release any
data associated with them (pages).
This and the patches leading up to it resolve:
http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/4657
Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
Reviewed-by: Josh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
Still using the osd request r_data_in and r_data_out pointer, but
we're basically only referring to it via the data pointers in the
osd ops. And we're transferring that information to the request
or reply message only when the op indicates it's needed, in
osd_req_encode_op().
To avoid a forward reference, ceph_osdc_msg_data_set() was moved up
in the file.
Don't bother calling ceph_osd_data_init(), in ceph_osd_alloc(),
because the ops array will already be zeroed anyway.
Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
Reviewed-by: Josh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
This ends up being a rather large patch but what it's doing is
somewhat straightforward.
Basically, this is replacing two calls with one. The first of the
two calls is initializing a struct ceph_osd_data with data (either a
page array, a page list, or a bio list); the second is setting an
osd request op so it associates that data with one of the op's
parameters. In place of those two will be a single function that
initializes the op directly.
That means we sort of fan out a set of the needed functions:
- extent ops with pages data
- extent ops with pagelist data
- extent ops with bio list data
and
- class ops with page data for receiving a response
We also have define another one, but it's only used internally:
- class ops with pagelist data for request parameters
Note that we *still* haven't gotten rid of the osd request's
r_data_in and r_data_out fields. All the osd ops refer to them for
their data. For now, these data fields are pointers assigned to the
appropriate r_data_* field when these new functions are called.
Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
Reviewed-by: Josh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
All calls of ceph_osdc_start_request() are preceded (in the case of
rbd, almost) immediately by a call to ceph_osdc_build_request().
Move the build calls at the top of ceph_osdc_start_request() out of
there and into the ceph_osdc_build_request(). Nothing prevents
moving these calls to the top of ceph_osdc_build_request(), either
(and we're going to want them there in the next patch) so put them
at the top.
This and the next patch are related to:
http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/4657
Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
Reviewed-by: Josh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
This simply moves ceph_osdc_build_request() later in its source
file without any change. Done as a separate patch to facilitate
review of the change in the next patch.
Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
Reviewed-by: Josh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
An object class method is formatted using a pagelist which contains
the class name, the method name, and the data concatenated into an
osd request's outbound data.
Currently when a class op is initialized in osd_req_op_cls_init(),
the lengths of and pointers to these three items are recorded.
Later, when the op is getting formatted into the request message, a
new pagelist is created and that is when these items get copied into
the pagelist.
This patch makes it so the pagelist to hold these items is created
when the op is initialized instead.
Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
Reviewed-by: Josh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
An osd request now holds all of its source op structures, and every
place that initializes one of these is in fact initializing one
of the entries in the the osd request's array.
So rather than supplying the address of the op to initialize, have
caller specify the osd request and an indication of which op it
would like to initialize. This better hides the details the
op structure (and faciltates moving the data pointers they use).
Since osd_req_op_init() is a common routine, and it's not used
outside the osd client code, give it static scope. Also make
it return the address of the specified op (so all the other
init routines don't have to repeat that code).
Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
Reviewed-by: Josh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
An extent type osd operation currently implies that there will
be corresponding data supplied in the data portion of the request
(for write) or response (for read) message. Similarly, an osd class
method operation implies a data item will be supplied to receive
the response data from the operation.
Add a ceph_osd_data pointer to each of those structures, and assign
it to point to eithre the incoming or the outgoing data structure in
the osd message. The data is not always available when an op is
initially set up, so add two new functions to allow setting them
after the op has been initialized.
Begin to make use of the data item pointer available in the osd
operation rather than the request data in or out structure in
places where it's convenient. Add some assertions to verify
pointers are always set the way they're expected to be.
This is a sort of stepping stone toward really moving the data
into the osd request ops, to allow for some validation before
making that jump.
This is the first in a series of patches that resolve:
http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/4657
Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
Reviewed-by: Josh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
There are fields "indata" and "indata_len" defined the ceph osd
request op structure. The "in" part is with from the point of view
of the osd server, but is a little confusing here on the client
side. Change their names to use "request" instead of "in" to
indicate that it defines data provided with the request (as opposed
the data returned in the response).
Rename the local variable in osd_req_encode_op() to match.
Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
Reviewed-by: Josh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
An osd request keeps a pointer to the osd operations (ops) array
that it builds in its request message.
In order to allow each op in the array to have its own distinct
data, we will need to keep track of each op's data, and that
information does not go over the wire.
As long as we're tracking the data we might as well just track the
entire (source) op definition for each of the ops. And if we're
doing that, we'll have no more need to keep a pointer to the
wire-encoded version.
This patch makes the array of source ops be kept with the osd
request structure, and uses that instead of the version encoded in
the message in places where that was previously used. The array
will be embedded in the request structure, and the maximum number of
ops we ever actually use is currently 2. So reduce CEPH_OSD_MAX_OP
to 2 to reduce the size of the structure.
The result of doing this sort of ripples back up, and as a result
various function parameters and local variables become unnecessary.
Make r_num_ops be unsigned, and move the definition of struct
ceph_osd_req_op earlier to ensure it's defined where needed.
It does not yet add per-op data, that's coming soon.
This resolves:
http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/4656
Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
Reviewed-by: Josh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
One more osd data helper, which returns the length of the
data item, regardless of its type.
Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
Reviewed-by: Josh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
Define ceph_osd_data_init() and ceph_osd_data_release() to clean up
a little code.
Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
Reviewed-by: Josh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
Define and use functions that encapsulate the initializion of a
ceph_osd_data structure.
Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
Reviewed-by: Josh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
This is a simple change, extracting the number of incoming data
bytes just once in handle_reply().
Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
Reviewed-by: Josh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
In prepare_message_data(), the length used to initialize the cursor
is taken from the header of the message provided. I'm working
toward not using the header data length field to determine length in
outbound messages, and this is a step in that direction. For
inbound messages this will be set to be the actual number of bytes
that are arriving (which may be less than the total size of the data
buffer available).
This resolves:
http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/4589
Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
Reviewed-by: Josh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
Hold off building the osd request message in ceph_writepages_start()
until just before it will be submitted to the osd client for
execution.
We'll still create the request and allocate the page pointer array
after we learn we have at least one page to write. A local variable
will be used to keep track of the allocated array of pages. Wait
until just before submitting the request for assigning that page
array pointer to the request message.
Create ands use a new function osd_req_op_extent_update() whose
purpose is to serve this one spot where the length value supplied
when an osd request's op was initially formatted might need to get
changed (reduced, never increased) before submitting the request.
Previously, ceph_writepages_start() assigned the message header's
data length because of this update. That's no longer necessary,
because ceph_osdc_build_request() will recalculate the right
value to use based on the content of the ops in the request.
Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
Reviewed-by: Josh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
Defer building the osd request until just before submitting it in
all callers except ceph_writepages_start(). (That caller will be
handed in the next patch.)
Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
Reviewed-by: Josh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
This patch moves the call to ceph_osdc_build_request() out of
ceph_osdc_new_request() and into its caller.
This is in order to defer formatting osd operation information into
the request message until just before request is started.
The only unusual (ab)user of ceph_osdc_build_request() is
ceph_writepages_start(), where the final length of write request may
change (downward) based on the current inode size or the oldest
snapshot context with dirty data for the inode.
The remaining callers don't change anything in the request after has
been built.
This means the ops array is now supplied by the caller. It also
means there is no need to pass the mtime to ceph_osdc_new_request()
(it gets provided to ceph_osdc_build_request()). And rather than
passing a do_sync flag, have the number of ops in the ops array
supplied imply adding a second STARTSYNC operation after the READ or
WRITE requested.
This and some of the patches that follow are related to having the
messenger (only) be responsible for filling the content of the
message header, as described here:
http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/4589
Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
Reviewed-by: Josh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
Keep track of the length of the data portion for a message in a
separate field in the ceph_msg structure. This information has
been maintained in wire byte order in the message header, but
that's going to change soon.
Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
Reviewed-by: Josh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
A field in an osd request keeps track of whether a connection is
currently filling the request's reply message. This patch gets rid
of that field.
An osd request includes two messages--a request and a reply--and
they're both associated with the connection that existed to its
the target osd at the time the request was created.
An osd request can be dropped early, even when it's in flight.
And at that time both messages are released. It's possible the
reply message has been supplied to its connection to receive
an incoming response message at the time the osd request gets
dropped. So ceph_osdc_release_request() revokes that message
from the connection before releasing it so things get cleaned up
properly.
Previously this may have caused a problem, because the connection
that a message was associated with might have gone away before the
revoke request. And to avoid any problems using that connection,
the osd client held a reference to it when it supplies its response
message.
However since this commit:
38941f80 libceph: have messages point to their connection
all messages hold a reference to the connection they are associated
with whenever the connection is actively operating on the message
(i.e. while the message is queued to send or sending, and when it
data is being received into it). And if a message has no connection
associated with it, ceph_msg_revoke_incoming() won't do anything
when asked to revoke it.
As a result, there is no need to keep an additional reference to the
connection associated with a message when we hand the message to the
messenger when it calls our alloc_msg() method to receive something.
If the connection *were* operating on it, it would have its own
reference, and if not, there's no work to be done when we need to
revoke it.
So get rid of the osd request's r_con_filling_msg field.
This resolves:
http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/4647
Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
Reviewed-by: Josh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
There are two basically identical definitions of __decode_pgid()
in libceph, one in "net/ceph/osdmap.c" and the other in
"net/ceph/osd_client.c". Get rid of both, and instead define
a single inline version in "include/linux/ceph/osdmap.h".
Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
Reviewed-by: Josh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
The osd client mutex is acquired just before getting a reference to
a request in handle_reply(). However the error paths after that
don't drop the mutex before returning as they should.
Drop the mutex after dropping the request reference. Also add a
bad_mutex label at that point and use it so the failed request
lookup case can be handled with the rest.
This resolves:
http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/4615
Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
Reviewed-by: Sage Weil <sage@inktank.com>
Use osd_req_op_extent_init() in ceph_osdc_new_request() to
initialize the one or two ops built in that function.
Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
Reviewed-by: Josh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
All callers of ceph_osd_new_request() pass either CEPH_OSD_OP_READ
or CEPH_OSD_OP_WRITE as the opcode value. The function assumes it
by filling in the extent fields in the ops array it builds. So just
assert that is the case, and don't bother calling op_has_extent()
before filling in the first osd operation in the array.
Define some local variables to gather the information to fill into
the first op, and then fill in the op array all in one place.
Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
Reviewed-by: Josh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
The ceph_osdc_new_request() an array of osd operations is built up
and filled in partially within that function and partially in the
called function calc_layout(). Move the latter part back out to
ceph_osdc_new_request() so it's all done in one place. This makes
it unnecessary to pass the op pointer to calc_layout(), so get rid
of that parameter.
Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
Reviewed-by: Josh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
The purpose of calc_layout() is to determine, given a file offset
and length and a layout describing the placement of file data across
objects, where in "object space" that data resides.
Specifically, it determines which object should hold the first part
of the specified range of file data, and the offset and length of
data within that object. The length will not exceed the bounds
of the object, and the caller is informed of that maximum length.
Add two parameters to calc_layout() to allow the object-relative
offset and length to be passed back to the caller.
This is the first steps toward having ceph_osdc_new_request() build
its osd op structure using osd_req_op_extent_init().
Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
Reviewed-by: Josh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
The rbd code has a function that allocates and populates a
ceph_osd_req_op structure (the in-core version of an osd request
operation). When reviewed, Josh suggested two things: that the
big varargs function might be better split into type-specific
functions; and that this functionality really belongs in the osd
client rather than rbd.
This patch implements both of Josh's suggestions. It breaks
up the rbd function into separate functions and defines them
in the osd client module as exported interfaces. Unlike the
rbd version, however, the functions don't allocate an osd_req_op
structure; they are provided the address of one and that is
initialized instead.
The rbd function has been eliminated and calls to it have been
replaced by calls to the new routines. The rbd code now now use a
stack (struct) variable to hold the op rather than allocating and
freeing it each time.
For now only the capabilities used by rbd are implemented.
Implementing all the other osd op types, and making the rest of the
code use it will be done separately, in the next few patches.
Note that only the extent, cls, and watch portions of the
ceph_osd_req_op structure are currently used. Delete the others
(xattr, pgls, and snap) from its definition so nobody thinks it's
actually implemented or needed. We can add it back again later
if needed, when we know it's been tested.
This (and a few follow-on patches) resolves:
http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/3861
Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
Reviewed-by: Josh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
Define a separate function to determine the validity of an opcode,
and use it inside osd_req_encode_op() in order to unclutter that
function.
Don't update the destination op at all--and return zero--if an
unsupported or unrecognized opcode is seen in osd_req_encode_op().
Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
Reviewed-by: Josh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
In ceph_osdc_build_request() there is a call to cpu_to_le16() which
provides a 64-bit value as its argument. Because of the implied
byte swapping going on it looked pretty suspect to me.
At the moment it turns out the behavior is well defined, but masking
off those bottom bits explicitly eliminates this distraction, and is
in fact more directly related to the purpose of the message header's
data_off field.
This resolves:
http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/4125
Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
Reviewed-by: Josh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
