tmp_suning_uos_patched/fs/btrfs/async-thread.h
Ilya Dryomov 964fb15acf Btrfs: eliminate races in worker stopping code
The current implementation of worker threads in Btrfs has races in
worker stopping code, which cause all kinds of panics and lockups when
running btrfs/011 xfstest in a loop.  The problem is that
btrfs_stop_workers is unsynchronized with respect to check_idle_worker,
check_busy_worker and __btrfs_start_workers.

E.g., check_idle_worker race flow:

       btrfs_stop_workers():            check_idle_worker(aworker):
- grabs the lock
- splices the idle list into the
  working list
- removes the first worker from the
  working list
- releases the lock to wait for
  its kthread's completion
                                  - grabs the lock
                                  - if aworker is on the working list,
                                    moves aworker from the working list
                                    to the idle list
                                  - releases the lock
- grabs the lock
- puts the worker
- removes the second worker from the
  working list
                              ......
        btrfs_stop_workers returns, aworker is on the idle list
                 FS is umounted, memory is freed
                              ......
              aworker is waken up, fireworks ensue

With this applied, I wasn't able to trigger the problem in 48 hours,
whereas previously I could reliably reproduce at least one of these
races within an hour.

Reported-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
2013-10-04 16:02:13 -04:00

122 lines
3.8 KiB
C

/*
* Copyright (C) 2007 Oracle. All rights reserved.
*
* This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
* modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public
* License v2 as published by the Free Software Foundation.
*
* This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
* but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
* MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU
* General Public License for more details.
*
* You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public
* License along with this program; if not, write to the
* Free Software Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place - Suite 330,
* Boston, MA 021110-1307, USA.
*/
#ifndef __BTRFS_ASYNC_THREAD_
#define __BTRFS_ASYNC_THREAD_
struct btrfs_worker_thread;
/*
* This is similar to a workqueue, but it is meant to spread the operations
* across all available cpus instead of just the CPU that was used to
* queue the work. There is also some batching introduced to try and
* cut down on context switches.
*
* By default threads are added on demand up to 2 * the number of cpus.
* Changing struct btrfs_workers->max_workers is one way to prevent
* demand creation of kthreads.
*
* the basic model of these worker threads is to embed a btrfs_work
* structure in your own data struct, and use container_of in a
* work function to get back to your data struct.
*/
struct btrfs_work {
/*
* func should be set to the function you want called
* your work struct is passed as the only arg
*
* ordered_func must be set for work sent to an ordered work queue,
* and it is called to complete a given work item in the same
* order they were sent to the queue.
*/
void (*func)(struct btrfs_work *work);
void (*ordered_func)(struct btrfs_work *work);
void (*ordered_free)(struct btrfs_work *work);
/*
* flags should be set to zero. It is used to make sure the
* struct is only inserted once into the list.
*/
unsigned long flags;
/* don't touch these */
struct btrfs_worker_thread *worker;
struct list_head list;
struct list_head order_list;
};
struct btrfs_workers {
/* current number of running workers */
int num_workers;
int num_workers_starting;
/* max number of workers allowed. changed by btrfs_start_workers */
int max_workers;
/* once a worker has this many requests or fewer, it is idle */
int idle_thresh;
/* force completions in the order they were queued */
int ordered;
/* more workers required, but in an interrupt handler */
int atomic_start_pending;
/*
* are we allowed to sleep while starting workers or are we required
* to start them at a later time? If we can't sleep, this indicates
* which queue we need to use to schedule thread creation.
*/
struct btrfs_workers *atomic_worker_start;
/* list with all the work threads. The workers on the idle thread
* may be actively servicing jobs, but they haven't yet hit the
* idle thresh limit above.
*/
struct list_head worker_list;
struct list_head idle_list;
/*
* when operating in ordered mode, this maintains the list
* of work items waiting for completion
*/
struct list_head order_list;
struct list_head prio_order_list;
/* lock for finding the next worker thread to queue on */
spinlock_t lock;
/* lock for the ordered lists */
spinlock_t order_lock;
/* extra name for this worker, used for current->name */
char *name;
int stopping;
};
void btrfs_queue_worker(struct btrfs_workers *workers, struct btrfs_work *work);
int btrfs_start_workers(struct btrfs_workers *workers);
void btrfs_stop_workers(struct btrfs_workers *workers);
void btrfs_init_workers(struct btrfs_workers *workers, char *name, int max,
struct btrfs_workers *async_starter);
void btrfs_requeue_work(struct btrfs_work *work);
void btrfs_set_work_high_prio(struct btrfs_work *work);
#endif