One of the kmemleak changes caused the following
scheduling-while-holding-the-tasklist-lock regression on x86:
BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at mm/kmemleak.c:795
in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, pid: 1737, name: kmemleak
2 locks held by kmemleak/1737:
#0: (scan_mutex){......}, at: [<c10c4376>] kmemleak_scan_thread+0x45/0x86
#1: (tasklist_lock){......}, at: [<c10c3bb4>] kmemleak_scan+0x1a9/0x39c
Pid: 1737, comm: kmemleak Not tainted 2.6.31-rc1-tip #59266
Call Trace:
[<c105ac0f>] ? __debug_show_held_locks+0x1e/0x20
[<c102e490>] __might_sleep+0x10a/0x111
[<c10c38d5>] scan_yield+0x17/0x3b
[<c10c3970>] scan_block+0x39/0xd4
[<c10c3bc6>] kmemleak_scan+0x1bb/0x39c
[<c10c4331>] ? kmemleak_scan_thread+0x0/0x86
[<c10c437b>] kmemleak_scan_thread+0x4a/0x86
[<c104d73e>] kthread+0x6e/0x73
[<c104d6d0>] ? kthread+0x0/0x73
[<c100959f>] kernel_thread_helper+0x7/0x10
kmemleak: 834 new suspected memory leaks (see /sys/kernel/debug/kmemleak)
The bit causing it is highly dubious:
static void scan_yield(void)
{
might_sleep();
if (time_is_before_eq_jiffies(next_scan_yield)) {
schedule();
next_scan_yield = jiffies + jiffies_scan_yield;
}
}
It called deep inside the codepath and in a conditional way,
and that is what crapped up when one of the new scan_block()
uses grew a tasklist_lock dependency.
This minimal patch removes that yielding stuff and adds the
proper cond_resched().
The background scanning thread could probably also be reniced
to +10.
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Acked-by: Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
57d81f6f39