4db2ce0199
Several implementations were essentialy a common piece of C code using the cmpxchg() macro. Put the implementation in one spot that everyone can share, and convert sparc64 over to using this. Alpha is the lone arch-specific implementation, which codes up a special fast path for the common case in order to avoid GP reloading which a pure C version would require. Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
73 lines
1.7 KiB
C
73 lines
1.7 KiB
C
#include <linux/module.h>
|
|
#include <linux/spinlock.h>
|
|
#include <asm/atomic.h>
|
|
#include <asm/system.h>
|
|
|
|
#ifdef __HAVE_ARCH_CMPXCHG
|
|
/*
|
|
* This is an implementation of the notion of "decrement a
|
|
* reference count, and return locked if it decremented to zero".
|
|
*
|
|
* This implementation can be used on any architecture that
|
|
* has a cmpxchg, and where atomic->value is an int holding
|
|
* the value of the atomic (i.e. the high bits aren't used
|
|
* for a lock or anything like that).
|
|
*/
|
|
int _atomic_dec_and_lock(atomic_t *atomic, spinlock_t *lock)
|
|
{
|
|
int counter;
|
|
int newcount;
|
|
|
|
for (;;) {
|
|
counter = atomic_read(atomic);
|
|
newcount = counter - 1;
|
|
if (!newcount)
|
|
break; /* do it the slow way */
|
|
|
|
newcount = cmpxchg(&atomic->counter, counter, newcount);
|
|
if (newcount == counter)
|
|
return 0;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
spin_lock(lock);
|
|
if (atomic_dec_and_test(atomic))
|
|
return 1;
|
|
spin_unlock(lock);
|
|
return 0;
|
|
}
|
|
#else
|
|
/*
|
|
* This is an architecture-neutral, but slow,
|
|
* implementation of the notion of "decrement
|
|
* a reference count, and return locked if it
|
|
* decremented to zero".
|
|
*
|
|
* NOTE NOTE NOTE! This is _not_ equivalent to
|
|
*
|
|
* if (atomic_dec_and_test(&atomic)) {
|
|
* spin_lock(&lock);
|
|
* return 1;
|
|
* }
|
|
* return 0;
|
|
*
|
|
* because the spin-lock and the decrement must be
|
|
* "atomic".
|
|
*
|
|
* This slow version gets the spinlock unconditionally,
|
|
* and releases it if it isn't needed. Architectures
|
|
* are encouraged to come up with better approaches,
|
|
* this is trivially done efficiently using a load-locked
|
|
* store-conditional approach, for example.
|
|
*/
|
|
int _atomic_dec_and_lock(atomic_t *atomic, spinlock_t *lock)
|
|
{
|
|
spin_lock(lock);
|
|
if (atomic_dec_and_test(atomic))
|
|
return 1;
|
|
spin_unlock(lock);
|
|
return 0;
|
|
}
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
EXPORT_SYMBOL(_atomic_dec_and_lock);
|